• Ronald J. Fichera

Taxation of Residence in an Irrevocable Trust

Estate of Mary Van Riper v. Director, Division of Taxation


Walter and Mary Van Riper transferred ownership of their marital home to a single irrevocable trust. Walter passed away shortly after transfer of the property to the trust. Six years later, after Mary passed away, the trustee distributed the property to the couple’s niece.



In this appeal, the issue presented for the New Jersey Supreme Court was whether the New Jersey Division of Taxation (Division) properly taxed the full value of the home at the time of Mary’s death. Walter and Mary directed that, if sold, all proceeds from the sale of their residence would be held in trust for their benefit and would be utilized to provide housing and shelter during their lives. Walter died nineteen days after the creation of the Trust. Mary died six years later, still living in the marital residence.


Mary’s inheritance tax return reported one-half of the date-of-death value of the marital residence as taxable. However, the Division conducted an audit and imposed a transfer inheritance tax assessment based upon the entire value of the residence at the time of Mary’s death. Mary’s estate paid th


e tax assessed but filed an administrative protest challenging the transfer inheritance tax assessment. The Division issued its final determination that the full fair market value of the marital residence held by the Trust should be included in Mary’s taxable estate for transfer inheritance tax purposes.


The Appellate Division affirmed the Tax Court’s conclusion, rejecting the estate’s argument that transfer inheritance tax should only be assessed on Mary’s undivided one-half interest in the residence. The Supreme Court agreed with both the Tax Court and the Appellate Division that the Division properly taxed the entirety of the residence when both life interests were extinguished, and the remainder was transferred to Marita.


The property’s transfer, in its entirety, took place “at or after” Mary’s death, and was appropriately taxed at its full value at that time. “In light of the estate-planning mechanism used here, any other holding would introduce an intolerable measure of speculation and uncertainty in an area of law in which clarity, simplicity, and ease of implementation are paramount.”


https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/2020/a-51-18.html?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2020-02-07-trusts-estates-307a29b7a2&utm_content=text-case-read-more-3


1 view

          RJ Fichera Law Firm

      420 Lori Lane

      King of Prussia, PA 19406

         610-768-9255

 

                                 

Please review our Terms of Use/Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.

RJ Fichera Law Firm provides legal services and represents clients in Pennsylvania. For matters or cases outside Pennsylvania, our office works with local attorneys in each state as applicable. RJ Fichera Law Firm only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney-client relationship, which our website specifically does not create. It is imperative that any legal action should only be done on advice of counsel. This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.

RJ Fichera Law Firm  © 2018 by Ronald J. Fichera. All Rights Reserved.